In a recent intervention regarding the cinima review matter, the High Court made a significant clarification, emphasizing that it had not imposed a restriction on movie reviews within the first 7 days after a film’s release. The court aimed to dispel any misunderstandings that could potentially hinder the film industry’s progress.During the hearing, the court expressed concerns about safeguarding the film industry’s vitality and urged stakeholders to work collaboratively to maintain its growth. It questioned the actions of the Producers Association, highlighting that their engagement seemed reactive rather than proactive, prompting them to introspect their roles and responsibilities.
Moreover, the court criticized the Producers Association for their delayed response, pointing out their sudden involvement only after the court’s intervention. It emphasized the need for genuine efforts and engagement from industry bodies, not just during legal proceedings. The court also highlighted the role of vloggers, reassuring that the directive primarily concerned misleading practices and aimed to deter blackmailing tendencies.In essence, the High Court’s intervention aimed to clarify its stance, support the film industry’s well-being, and encourage responsible practices within the ecosystem, without impeding fair reviews and constructive criticism.